You can read about a poisonous mushroom in a book, but if you’ve eaten one and spent 24 hours sick, you know it’s poisonous in your body. That’s the difference between intellectual understanding and embodied knowledge. Experiments create the latter.
Intellectual knowledge can be debated forever—“do I have free will or not?” But if you run an experiment where you only do things you’re called to do for a week, and another where you deliberately choose every small thing, you get a felt sense that no argument can touch. You grok it—understand it on a physical level.
“It’s not book learning. It’s not something you can debate. And because of that, it really dictates your actions.”
This is why experiments are more transformative than reading or thinking: they engage the body’s learning system, which changes behavior. Thought alone rarely does.